“The Scottish Gamekeepers Association even warn that: ‘… The over-grazing damage was caused solely by mountain hares.'” https://www.onekind.scot/killing-mountain-hares-is-not-conservation/

The lack of native vegetation can in no way be attributed to (a) plagues of red grouse or (b) regular torching with accelerants.



“Several of the companies which offer the opportunity to kill Scottish hares also offer hunting trips in various African countries, such as Zimbabwe” https://www.onekind.scot/is-one-of-those-hares-named-cecil/

‘Scottish hares’ offered for hunting in Zimbabwe may be in breach of Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) legislation.


“Scientific objections to … culling sharks centre on the fact that in order to reduce attacks, a substantial number of animals will have to be removed, which will have a serious impact on the survival of already threatened species. … Shark attacks often attract huge publicity, but the risk of death from these animals is low compared to other causes of death. For comparison, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1,522 people died in transport accidents in Australia in 2011, 1,845 died in falls and several died after being bitten by dogs. … Shark attacks in Australia [averaged] 6.5 per year in the 1990s to 15 per year in the 2000s.” (http://www.nature.com/news/australian-shark-cull-plan-draws-scientists-ire-1.14373)

Should we propose
(a) culling cars,
(b) culling dogs, or
(c) expanding the Darwin Awards?